Home » Editorials » Reefer Madness: 'Driving While High' Laws Aren't Based on Science, Says Study

Reefer Madness: 'Driving While High' Laws Aren't Based on Science, Says Study

Marijuana weed pot joint

Impairment tests used by authorities in U.Utes. states where marijuana use is legal in some form have no basis in science, and their results essentially imply nothing, a recent study wraps up.

Commissioned by the American Car Association’s safety foundation, the study found that absolutely no blood test for THC, the active ingredient within marijuana, can precisely determine a driver’utes level of impairment, the Associated Press reports.

The finding blows legislation enforcement’s main method of convicting high drivers into the weeds.

In five from the six states that recently legalized marijuana, a motorist is deemed guilty of impaired traveling if their blood level of THC passes a certain threshold.

Because impairment levels are highly adjustable and depend on the person, rather than blood THC amounts, the tests result in some motorists being wrongfully charged, with other people going free, despite being high as a kite at the time of the test.

Regular customers, be it stoners or medicinal users, often display lower levels of disability than intermittent customers. Their blood, however, often contains THC for longer periods than a once-in-a-while weed smoker. TCH tests that minic the blood alcohol tests administered in order to drunk drivers won’t recognize these distinctions.

AAA wants the assessments?scrapped and replaced with an observation-based system, where trained officers analyze a number of physiological and behavior indicators to determine the person’s level of impairment.

“There is understandably a powerful desire by both lawmakers and the community to create legal limits for marijuana disability in the same manner we do alcoholic beverages,” said Marshall Doney, AAA’s president and CEO. “In the case of marijuana, this approach is actually flawed and not based on scientific research.”

The 6 states that use the actual blood test — Ohio, Nevada, Washington, Colorado, Montana and Pennsylvania?- might be joined by more says this fall. Their ranks could dual, in fact, as congress seek a way of detecting high drivers.

The research is a buzzkill for police force members and state-level bureaucrats, but if the sole purpose of the actual THC blood test would be to make roads less dangerous from impaired drivers, its findings plead for acknowledgment.

North of the border, Cannabis -?erm, Canada – plans to legalize cannabis use in the near future. The study will be of interest to their authorities, too.

A Ny University professor cited by the Associated Press said there’utes a number of marijuana-related laws looking for fixing.?Mark The. R. Kleiman, who specializes in medication and criminal coverage, said several says have laws towards motorists having any kind of THC in their bloodstream, even though trace amounts may linger weeks following the individual became alcohol free as a judge.

A noisy child in the backseat of a vehicle is really as big a risk element as using cannabis, Kleiman said.

Don't be shellfish...
Author: admin
Tags

Similar posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *